Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 Compensation Orders
Compensation Orders following disqualification – COMMENCEMENT ORDER TO BE ANNOUNCED
This is part of a series of posts on the Small Business, Enterprise & Employment Billthat has now come into force on 26 March 2015 following the grant of Royal Assent and is now the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 (“the Act”).
This series of posts is intended to update the readers of the key changes, which should radically transform the transparency of the marketplace as regards the operation, control, ownership and risk associated to limited companies in the UK.
We have not addressed all of the issues described in our previous posts, to avoid duplication, but would welcome any queries from the reader in this respect.
The commencement of these changes is different dependant on which part of the Act is being reviewed (Section 164 of the Act defines commencement) and we have highlighted below the relevant commencement dates. Where we below stated “to be announced” this means it has not yet come into force and will commence upon the making of a Commencement Order.
Thechanges as set out below will be extremely important to all directors, companies and individuals with business in the future and it cannot be emphasised too strongly how important it is that you are prepared for these proposed changes. At Francis Wilks & Joneswe can advise on all matters subject to these posts.
At Section 110 of the Act is a further consequence for directors of insolvent companies. This inserts Section 15A into the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 andprovides that, upon the application of the Secretary of State, the Court to make a Compensation Order against a disqualified director provided such misconduct, “has caused loss to one or more creditors of an insolvent company”.
The prime situation where this is likely to occur is where HMRC have not been paid or has been paid less. The amount payable under the compensation order is referable to the directors’ conduct and the quantum of the loss which, without any further restriction, could make this an extremely severe penalty for directors who are liable by reference to their failure to control the wrongdoing director (for example non-executive and spouse directors who may otherwise have had limited involvement in the company).